Peugeot 206 1998 vs Volkswagen Polo 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 2.0 | 1.0 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 138 HP | 50 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 94 - 205 NM | 86 - 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 - 15.9 seconds | 8.7 - 18.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 7.7 | 4.4 - 7.5 | |
|
Peugeot 206 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. On average, a Peugeot 206 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 206 is 8 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1070 litres | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1130 litres | 975 litres | |
|
Peugeot 206 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 206 has 825 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 206 (by 155 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`509 | ~ 1`416 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |