Peugeot 206 1998 vs Renault Laguna 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 138 HP | 101 - 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 94 - 205 NM | 148 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 - 15.9 seconds | 8.1 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 7.7 | 5.4 - 10.1 | |
|
Peugeot 206 petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Laguna. On average, Peugeot 206 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Peugeot 206 is smaller. Peugeot 206 is 76 cm shorter than the Renault Laguna, 10 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1070 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1130 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 1 metres less than that of the Renault Laguna, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`509 | ~ 1`377 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |