Peugeot 206 1998 vs Peugeot 307 2002

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Peugeot 206
1998 - 2002
Peugeot 307
2002 - 2005
Body: HatchbackEstate car / wagon
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.1 - 2.01.4 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 60 - 138 HP68 - 138 HP
Torque: 94 - 205 NM120 - 320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.3 - 15.9 seconds9.5 - 16.5 seconds
In general, Peugeot 307 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Peugeot 206. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.3 - 7.74.7 - 8.8
Peugeot 206 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 307. On average, Peugeot 206 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 307.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.82 m4.42 m
Width: 1.65 m1.76 m
Height: 1.43 m1.51 m
Peugeot 206 is smaller.
Peugeot 206 is 60 cm shorter than the Peugeot 307, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 1070 litres503 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1130 litres1540 litres
Even though the car is shorter, The Peugeot 307 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 307 (by 410 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.9 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Peugeot 307, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: ~ 1`509 kg~ 1`991 kg
Net weight:~ 1`006 kg~ 1`392 kg
Load capacity:~ 503 kg~ 599 kg
Peugeot 206 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem less than Peugeot 307. Therefore, Peugeot 307 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

low
Average price (€): 10001000
Pros and Cons: Peugeot 206 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Peugeot 307 has
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv