Peugeot 206 2005 vs Mazda 2 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 | 1.3 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 110 HP | 68 - 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 240 NM | 121 - 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 13.1 seconds | 10.4 - 15.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 7.1 | 4.2 - 6.8 | |
|
Peugeot 206 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 2. On average, Peugeot 206 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Peugeot 206 is smaller. Peugeot 206 is 8 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
992 litres | 787 litres | |
| Peugeot 206 has 5 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 206 (by 205 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 2. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`529 | ~ 1`496 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |