Peugeot 206 2009 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot 206 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Mitsubishi Colt has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.4 (petrol, diesel) | 1.1 - 1.5 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 75 HP | 75 - 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 94 - 160 NM | 100 - 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 - 16.1 seconds | 9.8 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 - 6.3 | 5.5 - 6.1 | |
|
Peugeot 206 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.87 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Peugeot 206 is smaller. Peugeot 206 and Mitsubishi Colt are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
992 litres | no data | |
|
Peugeot 206 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 206 has 25 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`427 | ~ 1`439 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |