Peugeot 206 2007 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 (petrol) | 1.1 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 110 HP | 75 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 147 NM | 100 - 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 - 13.2 seconds | 8 - 12.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.8 - 6.8 | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.52 m | |
| Peugeot 206 is 38 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
402 litres | 400 litres | |
|
Peugeot 206 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 206 has 182 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 206 (by 2 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`567 | ~ 1`463 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |