Peugeot 206 2007 vs Mazda 3 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 (petrol) | 1.3 - 2.3 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 110 HP | 84 - 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 147 NM | 122 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 - 13.2 seconds | 6.1 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.7 - 9.7 | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Peugeot 206 is smaller. Peugeot 206 is 30 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
402 litres | 1285 litres | |
| Peugeot 206 has 11 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 883 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`567 | ~ 1`796 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |