Peugeot 206 2002 vs Mazda 2 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.1 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 138 HP | 68 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 94 - 240 NM | 110 - 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 15.8 seconds | 11.4 - 16 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 7.9 | 4.5 - 7.1 | |
|
Peugeot 206 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 2. On average, Peugeot 206 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.54 m | |
| Peugeot 206 is 11 cm longer than the Mazda 2, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 313 litres | 267 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1365 litres | 1044 litres | |
|
Peugeot 206 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 206 has 46 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 206 (by 321 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 2. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`550 | ~ 1`512 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |