Peugeot 206 1998 vs Peugeot 106 1996

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Peugeot 206
1998 - 2003
Peugeot 106
1996 - 2003
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.1 - 2.01.0 - 1.6

Performance

Power: 60 - 177 HP50 - 118 HP
Torque: 94 - 205 NM74 - 145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.5 - 15.9 seconds8.7 - 19.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.3 - 7.95.3 - 8.8
Peugeot 206 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 106. On average, Peugeot 206 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 106.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.82 m3.68 m
Width: 1.65 m1.59 m
Height: 1.43 m1.38 m
Peugeot 206 is larger.
Peugeot 206 is 14 cm longer than the Peugeot 106, 6 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 1070 litres215 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1130 litres953 litres
Peugeot 206 has more luggage capacity.
Peugeot 206 has 855 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 106. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 206 (by 177 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.9 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Peugeot 106, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`514~ 1`328
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

below average
Average price (€): 8001200
Pros and Cons: Peugeot 206 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv