Peugeot 206 1998 vs Citroen C2 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 2.0 | 1.1 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 177 HP | 61 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 94 - 205 NM | 94 - 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 15.9 seconds | 8.9 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 7.9 | 4.1 - 6.9 | |
|
Peugeot 206 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen C2. On average, Peugeot 206 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C2. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.46 m | |
| Peugeot 206 is 15 cm longer than the Citroen C2, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1070 litres | 193 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1130 litres | 879 litres | |
|
Peugeot 206 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 206 has 877 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 206 (by 251 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 1.3 metres less than that of the Citroen C2, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`514 | ~ 1`390 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Citroen C2 has
| |