Peugeot 206 2002 vs Skoda Fabia 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 2.0 | 1.0 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 110 HP | 50 - 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 94 - 240 NM | 84 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 - 15.9 seconds | 9.6 - 20.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 7.1 | 4.5 - 7.8 | |
|
Peugeot 206 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Skoda Fabia. On average, Peugeot 206 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.45 m | |
| Peugeot 206 is 14 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, width is practically the same , while the height of Peugeot 206 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
992 litres | 1016 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Peugeot 206 has 50 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 24 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`521 | ~ 1`579 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |