Peugeot 206 2002 vs Renault Clio 2001

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Peugeot 206
2002 - 2006
Renault Clio
2001 - 2003
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.1 - 2.01.1 - 1.9

Performance

Power: 60 - 110 HP60 - 110 HP
Torque: 94 - 240 NM93 - 185 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.4 - 15.9 seconds9.6 - 15 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.3 - 7.14.2 - 7.4
Peugeot 206 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. On average, Peugeot 206 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.82 m3.81 m
Width: 1.65 m1.64 m
Height: 1.43 m1.42 m
Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 206 is 1 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 1 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 210 litres510 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
992 litresno data
Renault Clio has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Peugeot 206 has 300 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. This could mean that the Peugeot 206 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 9.9 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`521~ 1`495
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

below average
Average price (€): 10001000
Pros and Cons: Peugeot 206 has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Renault Clio has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv