Peugeot 206 2005 vs Citroen C3 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.1 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 110 HP | 61 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 240 NM | 94 - 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 - 13.1 seconds | 10.5 - 15.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 7.1 | 4.4 - 7.2 | |
|
Peugeot 206 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen C3. On average, Peugeot 206 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Peugeot 206 is smaller. Peugeot 206 is 3 cm shorter than the Citroen C3, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 305 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
992 litres | 1150 litres | |
|
Citroen C3 has more luggage space. Peugeot 206 has 60 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C3 (by 158 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 1.7 metres less than that of the Citroen C3, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`538 | ~ 1`547 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Citroen C3 has
| |