Peugeot 206 2009 vs Volvo V40 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot 206 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Volvo V40 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.4 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 75 HP | 115 - 254 HP | |
| Torque: | 94 - 160 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 - 16.1 seconds | 6.3 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 - 6.3 | 3.2 - 9.0 | |
|
Peugeot 206 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, a Peugeot 206 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.87 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Peugeot 206 is smaller, but slightly higher. Peugeot 206 is 50 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 18 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
992 litres | no data | |
|
Volvo V40 has more luggage space. Peugeot 206 has 90 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`427 | ~ 1`976 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |