Peugeot 206 2009 vs Rover 25 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Peugeot 206 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Rover 25 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Engines: | 1.1 - 1.4 | 1.1 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 - 75 HP | 75 - 145 HP | |
Torque: | 94 - 160 NM | 95 - 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 - 16.1 seconds | 7.8 - 13.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 - 6.3 | 5.2 - 8.2 | |
Peugeot 206 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Rover 25. On average, Peugeot 206 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 25. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.87 m | 3.99 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.42 m | |
Peugeot 206 is smaller, but slightly higher. Peugeot 206 is 12 cm shorter than the Rover 25, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 304 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
992 litres | 1086 litres | |
Rover 25 has more luggage space. Peugeot 206 has 59 litres less trunk space than the Rover 25. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 25 (by 94 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Rover 25, which means Peugeot 206 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`427 | ~ 1`513 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2400 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Rover 25 has
| |