Peugeot 206 2009 vs Ford KA 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.4 | 1.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 75 HP | 69 - 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 94 - 160 NM | 102 - 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 - 16.1 seconds | 13 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 - 6.3 | 4.2 - 5.1 | |
|
Peugeot 206 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford KA. On average, Peugeot 206 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.87 m | 3.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.51 m | |
| Peugeot 206 is 25 cm longer than the Ford KA, width is practically the same , while the height of Peugeot 206 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 224 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
992 litres | 710 litres | |
|
Peugeot 206 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 206 has 21 litres more trunk space than the Ford KA. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 206 (by 282 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 1.5 metres more than that of the Ford KA, which means Peugeot 206 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`427 | ~ 1`368 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Ford KA has
| |