Opel Vectra 1999 vs Toyota Corolla 2003
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Opel Vectra) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Toyota Corolla) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Opel Vectra is more dynamic to drive. Opel Vectra engine produces 80 HP more power than Toyota Corolla, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Toyota Corolla. Thanks to more power Opel Vectra reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Corolla is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Vectra consumes 4.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Vectra could require 690 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Vectra consumes 4.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Corolla gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Toyota Corolla 2003 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota Corolla 2003 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.47 m | |
| Opel Vectra is 12 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla, width is practically the same , while the height of Opel Vectra is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 437 litres | |
|
Opel Vectra has more luggage capacity. Opel Vectra has 43 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Corolla. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Vectra is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Opel Vectra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Toyota Corolla has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Vectra has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Toyota Corolla, so Toyota Corolla quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Vectra has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |