Opel Vectra 2002 vs Ford Mondeo 2003

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Opel Vectra
2002 - 2005
Ford Mondeo
2003 - 2005
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 3.21.8 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 120 - 211 HP90 - 226 HP
Torque: 167 - 370 NM165 - 360 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.5 - 12 seconds7.4 - 12.8 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.7 - 10.05.7 - 10.7
Opel Vectra petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Mondeo. On average, a Opel Vectra with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Ford Mondeo.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.60 m4.73 m
Width: 1.80 m1.81 m
Height: 1.46 m1.43 m
Opel Vectra is smaller, but slightly higher.
Opel Vectra is 13 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Vectra is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 500 litres500 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1360 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Vectra is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`998~ 1`949
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

average
Average price (€): 12001200
Rating in user reviews: 7.7/10 7.5/10
Pros and Cons: Opel Vectra has
  • lower fuel consumption
Ford Mondeo has
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv