Opel Omega 1989 vs Audi 100 1990
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 177 HP | 120 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 265 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
Opel Omega engine produces 57 HP more power than Audi 100, but torque is 25 NM less than Audi 100. Thanks to more power Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 5.7 | |
The Audi 100 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Omega consumes 4.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 720 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 1400 km in combined cycle | |
Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Audi 100 1990 2.5 engine: Reliable and robust engine, keep an eye on the cooling system and the timing belt change interval. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.74 m | 4.79 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
Opel Omega is smaller. Opel Omega is 5 cm shorter than the Audi 100, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 570 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 610 litres | |
Audi 100 has more luggage space. Opel Omega has 50 litres less trunk space than the Audi 100. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Opel Omega can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`870 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3000 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Audi 100 has
| |