Opel Omega 1989 vs Audi 100 1990

 
Opel Omega
1989 - 1990
Audi 100
1990 - 1991
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 3.0 Petrol2.5 Diesel

Performance

Power: 177 HP120 HP
Torque: 240 NM265 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.8 seconds9.9 seconds
Opel Omega is more dynamic to drive.
Opel Omega engine produces 57 HP more power than Audi 100, but torque is 25 NM less than Audi 100. Thanks to more power Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.05.7
The Audi 100 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Opel Omega consumes 5.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 795 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 680 km in combined cycle1400 km in combined cycle
Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.74 m4.79 m
Width: 1.77 m1.81 m
Height: 1.42 m1.42 m
Opel Omega is smaller.
Opel Omega is 5 cm shorter than the Audi 100, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 520 litres570 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
870 litres610 litres
Opel Omega has 50 litres less trunk space than the Audi 100. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Omega (by 260 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Opel Omega can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9301`870
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 30001800
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
Audi 100 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv