Opel Omega 1989 vs BMW 3 series 1995

 
Opel Omega
1989 - 1990
BMW 3 series
1995 - 1998
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 3.0 Petrol2.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 177 HP193 HP
Torque: 240 NM280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.8 seconds7.3 seconds
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Omega engine produces 16 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 40 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.09.2
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Opel Omega consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 270 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 680 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.74 m4.43 m
Width: 1.77 m1.70 m
Height: 1.42 m1.39 m
Opel Omega is larger.
Opel Omega is 31 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 7 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 520 litres435 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
870 litresno data
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity.
Opel Omega has 85 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.9 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9301`780
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

low
Average price (€): 30002200
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv