Opel Omega 1990 vs BMW 5 series 1988

 
Opel Omega
1990 - 1992
BMW 5 series
1988 - 1992
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 3.6 Petrol3.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 377 HP211 HP
Torque: 568 NM305 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.4 seconds7.7 seconds
Opel Omega is more dynamic to drive.
Opel Omega engine produces 166 HP more power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 263 NM more than BMW 5 series. Thanks to more power Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.311.0
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Opel Omega consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
920 km on highway1000 km on highway

Dimensions

Length: 4.77 m4.72 m
Width: 1.81 m1.75 m
Height: 1.44 m1.41 m
Opel Omega is larger.
Opel Omega is 5 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 6 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 520 litres460 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
865 litresno data
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity.
Opel Omega has 60 litres more trunk space than the BMW 5 series.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.1 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1102`035
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

above average
BMW 5 series has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than BMW 5 series, so BMW 5 series quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 30003600
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
BMW 5 sērija has
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv