Opel Omega 1992 vs BMW 5 series 1988

	Opel Omega 1992 - 1993	BMW 5 series 1988 - 1990
Gearbox:	Automatic	Automatic
Engine:	3.0 Petrol	3.0 Petrol
Performance
Power:	200 HP	188 HP
Torque:	265 NM	260 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	8.6 seconds	11 seconds
	Opel Omega is more dynamic to drive. Opel Omega engine produces 12 HP more power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 5 NM more than BMW 5 series. Thanks to more power Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	10.3	11.0
	The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Omega consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity:	75 litres	80 litres
Full fuel tank distance:	720 km in combined cycle	720 km in combined cycle
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions
Length:	4.74 m	4.72 m
Width:	1.76 m	1.75 m
Height:	1.44 m	1.41 m
	Both cars are similar in size. Opel Omega is 2 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 1 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity:	520 litres	460 litres
	Opel Omega has more luggage capacity. Opel Omega has 60 litres more trunk space than the BMW 5 series.
Turning diameter:	10.9 meters	11 meters
	The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.1 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series.
Gross weight (kg):	no data	2`040

Safety:	no data	no data
Quality:	below average	above average
Average price (€):	3000	4400
Pros and Cons:	Opel Omega has more power more dynamic lower fuel consumption roomier boot lower price	BMW 5 sērija has fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Opel Omega 1992 vs BMW 5 series 1988

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions