Opel Omega 1992 vs Audi 80 1991

 
Opel Omega
1992 - 1993
Audi 80
1991 - 1995
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Petrol2.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 200 HP174 HP
Torque: 265 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.6 seconds9.6 seconds
Opel Omega is more dynamic to drive.
Opel Omega engine produces 26 HP more power than Audi 80, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Audi 80. Thanks to more power Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.39.9
Opel Omega consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres66 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle660 km in combined cycle
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.74 m4.48 m
Width: 1.76 m1.70 m
Height: 1.44 m1.41 m
Opel Omega is larger.
Opel Omega is 26 cm longer than the Audi 80, 6 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 520 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data710 litres
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity.
Opel Omega has 90 litres more trunk space than the Audi 80.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.3 metres less than that of the Audi 80.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`810
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

average
Audi 80 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Audi 80, so Audi 80 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 3000800
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Audi 80 has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv