Opel Omega 1992 vs Audi 100 1990
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Opel Omega is more dynamic to drive. Opel Omega engine produces 80 HP more power than Audi 100, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 5.7 | |
|
The Audi 100 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Omega consumes 4.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 690 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 1400 km in combined cycle | |
| Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Opel Omega is smaller, but slightly higher. Opel Omega is 5 cm shorter than the Audi 100, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Omega is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 570 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 610 litres | |
|
Audi 100 has more luggage space. Opel Omega has 50 litres less trunk space than the Audi 100. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Opel Omega can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Audi 100 has
| |