Opel Omega 1992 vs BMW 3 series 1995

 
Opel Omega
1992 - 1993
BMW 3 series
1995 - 1998
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 3.0 Petrol2.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 200 HP193 HP
Torque: 265 NM280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.6 seconds7.3 seconds
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Omega engine produces 7 HP more power than BMW 3 series, but torque is 15 NM less than BMW 3 series. Despite the higher power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.49.2
Real fuel consumption: 10.7 l/100km9.9 l/100km
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Opel Omega consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 180 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
700 km with real consumption650 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.74 m4.43 m
Width: 1.76 m1.70 m
Height: 1.44 m1.39 m
Opel Omega is larger.
Opel Omega is 31 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 6 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 520 litres435 litres
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity.
Opel Omega has 85 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.9 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`780
Safety: no data
Quality:BMW 3 series has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than BMW 3 series, so BMW 3 series quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 30002200
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • roomier boot
BMW 3 sērija has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv