Opel Omega 1990 vs Subaru Outback 2017
| Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.6 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Subaru Outback is a more dynamic driving. Opel Omega engine produces 25 HP less power than Subaru Outback, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Subaru Outback. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.2 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru Outback is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Omega consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 420 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Opel Omega is smaller. Opel Omega is 8 cm shorter than the Subaru Outback, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Omega is 24 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 512 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
820 litres | no data | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Opel Omega has 8 litres more trunk space than the Subaru Outback. The Subaru Outback may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.1 metres less than that of the Subaru Outback. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`955 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 26 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |