Opel Omega 1990 vs BMW 3 series 1995

 
Opel Omega
1990 - 1994
BMW 3 series
1995 - 1998
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.6 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP170 HP
Torque: 220 NM245 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.8 seconds9 seconds
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Omega engine produces 20 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 25 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.510.0
Real fuel consumption: 12.2 l/100km9.7 l/100km
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Opel Omega consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 75 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 710 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
970 km on highway890 km on highway
610 km with real consumption670 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.74 m4.43 m
Width: 1.76 m1.70 m
Height: 1.44 m1.39 m
Opel Omega is larger.
Opel Omega is 31 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 6 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 520 litres435 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
820 litresno data
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity.
Opel Omega has 85 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.9 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9551`805
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

low
Opel Omega has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Opel Omega, so Opel Omega quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 30002200
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv