Opel Omega 1990 vs Audi 80 1992

 
Opel Omega
1990 - 1994
Audi 80
1992 - 1995
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.6 Petrol2.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 220 NM225 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.8 seconds9.3 seconds
Audi 80 is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Omega and Audi 80 have the same engine power, but Opel Omega torque is 5 NM less than Audi 80. Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.49.2
Real fuel consumption: 10.7 l/100km10.3 l/100km
The Audi 80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Opel Omega consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 180 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres66 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle710 km in combined cycle
970 km on highway980 km on highway
700 km with real consumption640 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.74 m4.48 m
Width: 1.76 m1.70 m
Height: 1.44 m1.41 m
Opel Omega is larger.
Opel Omega is 26 cm longer than the Audi 80, 6 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 520 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
820 litres710 litres
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity.
Opel Omega has 90 litres more trunk space than the Audi 80. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Omega (by 110 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.3 metres less than that of the Audi 80.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9551`790
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

below average
Audi 80 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Omega, so Audi 80 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 3000800
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • roomier boot
Audi 80 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv