Opel Omega 1989 vs BMW 5 series 1988

 
Opel Omega
1989 - 1994
BMW 5 series
1988 - 1990
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.4 Petrol2.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 125 HP170 HP
Torque: 195 NM222 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 seconds11 seconds
BMW 5 series is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Omega engine produces 45 HP less power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 27 NM less than BMW 5 series. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.39.8
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Opel Omega consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 800 km in combined cycle810 km in combined cycle

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 560'000 km470'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Omega engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 7 years15 years
Engine spread: Used also on Opel FronteraUsed also on BMW 3 sērija
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 5 series might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Opel Omega engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.74 m4.72 m
Width: 1.76 m1.75 m
Height: 1.44 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. Opel Omega is 2 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 1 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 520 litres460 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
870 litresno data
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity.
Opel Omega has 60 litres more trunk space than the BMW 5 series.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.1 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8701`980
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

above average
Average price (€): 30003600
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • timing chain engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
BMW 5 sērija has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv