Opel Omega 1989 vs Ford Sierra 1990
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 171 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Opel Omega is more dynamic to drive. Opel Omega engine produces 5 HP more power than Ford Sierra, whereas torque is 24 NM more than Ford Sierra. Thanks to more power Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 7.8 | |
|
The Ford Sierra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Omega consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Opel Omega is larger. Opel Omega is 27 cm longer than the Ford Sierra, 6 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
870 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.9 metres more than that of the Ford Sierra, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Ford Sierra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Ford Sierra, so Ford Sierra quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Sierra has
| |