Opel Omega 1989 vs BMW 3 series 1995

 
Opel Omega
1989 - 1994
BMW 3 series
1995 - 1998
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.4 Petrol2.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 125 HP170 HP
Torque: 195 NM245 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 seconds9 seconds
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Omega engine produces 45 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 50 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.310.0
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Opel Omega consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 800 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
1080 km on highway890 km on highway
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 560'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Omega engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 7 years7 years
Engine spread: Used also on Opel FronteraUsed also on BMW 5 sērija
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.74 m4.43 m
Width: 1.76 m1.70 m
Height: 1.44 m1.39 m
Opel Omega is larger.
Opel Omega is 31 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 6 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 520 litres435 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
870 litresno data
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity.
Opel Omega has 85 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.9 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8701`805
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

low
Opel Omega has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Opel Omega, so Opel Omega quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 30002200
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv