Opel Omega 1989 vs Audi 100 1988

 
Opel Omega
1989 - 1994
Audi 100
1988 - 1991
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.4 Petrol2.3 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 125 HP136 HP
Torque: 195 NM190 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.8 seconds9.8 seconds
Audi 100 is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Omega engine produces 11 HP less power than Audi 100, but torque is 5 NM more than Audi 100. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.38.9
Opel Omega consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 800 km in combined cycle890 km in combined cycle
Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 560'000 km470'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Omega engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 7 years4 years
Engine spread: Used also on Opel FronteraUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Omega might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.74 m4.79 m
Width: 1.76 m1.81 m
Height: 1.44 m1.42 m
Opel Omega is smaller, but slightly higher.
Opel Omega is 5 cm shorter than the Audi 100, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Omega is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 520 litres570 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
870 litres610 litres
Opel Omega has 50 litres less trunk space than the Audi 100. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Omega (by 260 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Opel Omega can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8701`800
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 30001800
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • timing chain engine
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • better manoeuvrability
Audi 100 has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv