Opel Omega 1989 vs Mercedes E class 1993

 
Opel Omega
1989 - 1994
Mercedes E class
1993 - 1995
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.3 Diesel2.5 Diesel

Performance

Power: 101 HP113 HP
Torque: 215 NM170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14 seconds15.5 seconds
Opel Omega is more dynamic to drive.
Opel Omega engine produces 12 HP less power than Mercedes E class, but torque is 45 NM more than Mercedes E class. Despite less power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.27.1
Opel Omega consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1040 km in combined cycle980 km in combined cycle
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.74 m4.74 m
Width: 1.76 m1.74 m
Height: 1.44 m1.43 m
Both cars are similar in size. Opel Omega and Mercedes E class are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 520 litres390 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
870 litresno data
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity.
Opel Omega has 130 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes E class.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mercedes E class.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8952`020
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

high
Mercedes E class has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Mercedes E class, so Mercedes E class quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 30002600
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Mercedes E klase has
  • more power
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv