Opel Omega 1989 vs Mercedes S class 1993
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 3.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 73 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 138 NM | 310 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
Mercedes S class is a more dynamic driving. Opel Omega engine produces 77 HP less power than Mercedes S class, whereas torque is 172 NM less than Mercedes S class. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 6.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 9.7 | |
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Omega consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes S class, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 420 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 100 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1080 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.74 m | 5.11 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.49 m | |
Opel Omega is smaller. Opel Omega is 37 cm shorter than the Mercedes S class, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Omega is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 12.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 1.2 metres less than that of the Mercedes S class, which means Opel Omega can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`100 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | high | |
Mercedes S class has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Mercedes S class, so Mercedes S class quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 3000 | 6000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Mercedes S klase has
| |