Opel Omega 1989 vs Ford Sierra 1990

 
Opel Omega
1989 - 1994
Ford Sierra
1990 - 1993
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.3 Diesel1.8 Diesel

Performance

Power: 73 HP75 HP
Torque: 138 NM152 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 19 seconds16.4 seconds
Ford Sierra is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Omega engine produces 2 HP less power than Ford Sierra, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Ford Sierra. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.96.4
The Ford Sierra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Opel Omega consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 75 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1080 km in combined cycle930 km in combined cycle
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.74 m4.47 m
Width: 1.76 m1.70 m
Height: 1.44 m1.41 m
Opel Omega is larger.
Opel Omega is 27 cm longer than the Ford Sierra, 6 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 520 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.9 metres more than that of the Ford Sierra, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`150
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

below average
Ford Sierra has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Ford Sierra, so Ford Sierra quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 30002000
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Ford Sierra has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv