Opel Omega 1989 vs BMW 5 series 1988

 
Opel Omega
1989 - 1994
BMW 5 series
1988 - 1990
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 115 HP129 HP
Torque: 170 NM162 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.5 seconds14 seconds
Opel Omega is more dynamic to drive.
Opel Omega engine produces 14 HP less power than BMW 5 series, but torque is 8 NM more than BMW 5 series. Despite less power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.810.0
Real fuel consumption: 8.8 l/100km10.8 l/100km
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Opel Omega consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
850 km with real consumption740 km with real consumption
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 480'000 km440'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Omega engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 10 years15 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Frontera, Opel CalibraUsed also on BMW 3 sērija
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Opel Omega engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.74 m4.72 m
Width: 1.76 m1.75 m
Height: 1.44 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. Opel Omega is 2 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 1 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 520 litres460 litres
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity.
Opel Omega has 60 litres more trunk space than the BMW 5 series.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.1 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`930
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

above average
Average price (€): 30003600
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
BMW 5 sērija has
  • more power
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv