Opel Omega 1989 vs Audi 80 1991

 
Opel Omega
1989 - 1994
Audi 80
1991 - 1995
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 115 HP90 HP
Torque: 170 NM148 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.5 seconds16.4 seconds
Opel Omega is more dynamic to drive.
Opel Omega engine produces 25 HP more power than Audi 80, whereas torque is 22 NM more than Audi 80. Thanks to more power Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.88.9
Real fuel consumption: 8.8 l/100km9.8 l/100km
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Opel Omega consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres66 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
850 km with real consumption670 km with real consumption
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 480'000 km500'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 10 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Frontera, Opel CalibraUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Omega might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.74 m4.48 m
Width: 1.76 m1.70 m
Height: 1.44 m1.41 m
Opel Omega is larger.
Opel Omega is 26 cm longer than the Audi 80, 6 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 520 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data710 litres
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity.
Opel Omega has 90 litres more trunk space than the Audi 80.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.3 metres less than that of the Audi 80.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`670
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

below average
Audi 80 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Omega, so Audi 80 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 3000800
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Audi 80 has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv