Opel Omega 1989 vs Audi 100 1988

 
Opel Omega
1989 - 1994
Audi 100
1988 - 1991
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 115 HP116 HP
Torque: 170 NM172 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.5 seconds12.6 seconds
Opel Omega engine produces 1 HP less power than Audi 100, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Audi 100. Despite less power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.89.4
Real fuel consumption: 8.8 l/100km10.9 l/100km
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Opel Omega consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle850 km in combined cycle
850 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 480'000 km470'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 10 years2 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Frontera, Opel CalibraUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Omega might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.74 m4.79 m
Width: 1.76 m1.81 m
Height: 1.44 m1.42 m
Opel Omega is smaller, but slightly higher.
Opel Omega is 5 cm shorter than the Audi 100, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Omega is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 520 litres570 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data610 litres
Audi 100 has more luggage space.
Opel Omega has 50 litres less trunk space than the Audi 100.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Opel Omega can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`800
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 30001200
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Audi 100 has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv