Opel Omega 1989 vs Ford Sierra 1990

 
Opel Omega
1989 - 1994
Ford Sierra
1990 - 1993
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 115 HP120 HP
Torque: 170 NM171 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.5 seconds11.7 seconds
Ford Sierra is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Omega engine produces 5 HP less power than Ford Sierra, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Ford Sierra. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.87.8
Real fuel consumption: 8.8 l/100km8.2 l/100km
The Ford Sierra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Opel Omega consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 150 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
850 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.74 m4.47 m
Width: 1.76 m1.70 m
Height: 1.44 m1.41 m
Opel Omega is larger.
Opel Omega is 27 cm longer than the Ford Sierra, 6 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 520 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.9 metres more than that of the Ford Sierra, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`350
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

below average
Ford Sierra has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Ford Sierra, so Ford Sierra quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 30002000
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Ford Sierra has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv