Opel Omega 1989 vs BMW 5 series 1988

 
Opel Omega
1989 - 1993
BMW 5 series
1988 - 1990
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 115 HP129 HP
Torque: 170 NM162 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 seconds12 seconds
Opel Omega is more dynamic to drive.
Opel Omega engine produces 14 HP less power than BMW 5 series, but torque is 8 NM more than BMW 5 series. Despite less power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.810.0
Real fuel consumption: 9.6 l/100km10.2 l/100km
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Opel Omega consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
780 km with real consumption780 km with real consumption
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.74 m4.72 m
Width: 1.76 m1.75 m
Height: 1.44 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. Opel Omega is 2 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 1 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 520 litres460 litres
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity.
Opel Omega has 60 litres more trunk space than the BMW 5 series.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.1 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`910
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

above average
Average price (€): 30003400
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
BMW 5 sērija has
  • more power
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv