Opel Omega 1989 vs Audi 80 1989

 
Opel Omega
1989 - 1993
Audi 80
1989 - 1991
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 115 HP90 HP
Torque: 170 NM142 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 seconds12.4 seconds
Opel Omega is more dynamic to drive.
Opel Omega engine produces 25 HP more power than Audi 80, whereas torque is 28 NM more than Audi 80. Thanks to more power Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.87.6
The Audi 80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Opel Omega consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 180 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres68 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle890 km in combined cycle
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 480'000 km480'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 10 years7 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Frontera, Opel CalibraInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Audi Coupe
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Omega might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.74 m4.39 m
Width: 1.76 m1.70 m
Height: 1.44 m1.40 m
Opel Omega is larger.
Opel Omega is 35 cm longer than the Audi 80, 6 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 520 litres485 litres
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity.
Opel Omega has 35 litres more trunk space than the Audi 80.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.3 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.6 metres more than that of the Audi 80, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`480
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 30001400
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Audi 80 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv