Opel Omega 1989 vs Audi 100 1988

 
Opel Omega
1989 - 1993
Audi 100
1988 - 1990
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 115 HP138 HP
Torque: 170 NM188 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 seconds9.8 seconds
Audi 100 is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Omega engine produces 23 HP less power than Audi 100, whereas torque is 18 NM less than Audi 100. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.89.6
Real fuel consumption: 9.6 l/100km10.0 l/100km
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Opel Omega consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle830 km in combined cycle
780 km with real consumption800 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Audi 100 1988: Vehicle features full-time Quattro II all-wheel drive - Torsen center differential with automatic torque split between front and rear axles, and electro-pneumatic manually-activated rear differential that automatically unlocks at speeds above 25 km/h.

Dimensions

Length: 4.74 m4.79 m
Width: 1.76 m1.81 m
Height: 1.44 m1.42 m
Opel Omega is smaller, but slightly higher.
Opel Omega is 5 cm shorter than the Audi 100, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Omega is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 520 litres570 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data610 litres
Audi 100 has more luggage space.
Opel Omega has 50 litres less trunk space than the Audi 100.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Opel Omega can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`910
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 30001200
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Audi 100 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv