Opel Omega 1989 vs Audi 100 1988

	Opel Omega 1989 - 1993	Audi 100 1988 - 1990
Gearbox:	Manual	Manual
Engine:	2.0 Petrol	2.2 Petrol
Performance
Power:	115 HP	138 HP
Torque:	170 NM	188 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	11.5 seconds	9.6 seconds
	Audi 100 is a more dynamic driving. Opel Omega engine produces 23 HP less power than Audi 100, whereas torque is 18 NM less than Audi 100. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	8.8	8.8
Fuel tank capacity:	75 litres	80 litres
Full fuel tank distance:	850 km in combined cycle	900 km in combined cycle
	780 km with real consumption	800 km with real consumption
	Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type
Wheel drive type:	Rear wheel drive (RWD)	Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions
Length:	4.74 m	4.79 m
Width:	1.76 m	1.81 m
Height:	1.44 m	1.42 m
	Opel Omega is smaller, but slightly higher. Opel Omega is 5 cm shorter than the Audi 100, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Omega is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity:	520 litres	570 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down	no data	610 litres
	Audi 100 has more luggage space. Opel Omega has 50 litres less trunk space than the Audi 100.
Turning diameter:	10.9 meters	11.6 meters
	The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Opel Omega can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg):	no data	1`800

Safety:	no data	no data
Quality:	below average	no data
Average price (€):	3000	1200
Pros and Cons:	Opel Omega has better manoeuvrability	Audi 100 has more power more dynamic more full fuel tank mileage roomier boot lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Opel Omega 1989 vs Audi 100 1988

Performance

Fuel consumption

Drive type

Dimensions