Opel Omega 1989 vs VAZ 2105 1980
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 64 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 92 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 18 seconds | |
|
Opel Omega is more dynamic to drive. Opel Omega engine produces 51 HP more power than VAZ 2105, whereas torque is 78 NM more than VAZ 2105. Thanks to more power Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 6.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 10.0 | |
|
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Omega consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the VAZ 2105, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 39 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 390 km in combined cycle | |
| Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.13 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Opel Omega is larger, but slightly lower. Opel Omega is 61 cm longer than the VAZ 2105, 14 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 345 litres | |
|
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity. Opel Omega has 175 litres more trunk space than the VAZ 2105. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`395 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
VAZ 2105 has
| |