Opel Omega 1994 vs BMW 5 series 1988

 
Opel Omega
1994 - 1997
BMW 5 series
1988 - 1990
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Petrol3.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 211 HP188 HP
Torque: 270 NM260 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.8 seconds11 seconds
Opel Omega is more dynamic to drive.
Opel Omega engine produces 23 HP more power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 10 NM more than BMW 5 series. Thanks to more power Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.711.0
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Opel Omega consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 530'000 km460'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Omega engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 7 years24 years
Engine spread: Used also on Opel SintraUsed also on BMW 6 sērija
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 5 series might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Opel Omega engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.72 m
Width: 1.79 m1.75 m
Height: 1.46 m1.41 m
Opel Omega is larger.
Opel Omega is 7 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 4 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 530 litres460 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
830 litresno data
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity.
Opel Omega has 70 litres more trunk space than the BMW 5 series.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`1702`040
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

above average
Average price (€): 10004400
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
BMW 5 sērija has
  • timing chain engine
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv