Opel Omega 1994 vs Honda Saber 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 211 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 237 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Opel Omega engine produces 21 HP more power than Honda Saber, whereas torque is 33 NM more than Honda Saber. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 7.8 | |
|
The Honda Saber is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Omega consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Saber, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| Honda Saber gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Honda Saber) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Opel Omega) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.41 m | |
| Opel Omega is 5 cm shorter than the Honda Saber, width is practically the same , while the height of Opel Omega is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | no data | |
|
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Opel Omega has 130 litres more trunk space than the Honda Saber. The Honda Saber may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 1`380 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Honda Saber has
| |