Opel Omega 1994 vs Volvo S90 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 227 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo S90 is a more dynamic driving. Opel Omega engine produces 10 HP less power than Volvo S90, whereas torque is 33 NM less than Volvo S90. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 11.7 | |
|
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Omega consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S90, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.42 m | |
| Opel Omega is 8 cm shorter than the Volvo S90, 4 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 9.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 1.3 metres more than that of the Volvo S90, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Volvo S90 has
| |