Opel Omega 1994 vs Ford Scorpio 1997
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 130 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 260 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 13 seconds | |
Opel Omega is more dynamic to drive. Opel Omega engine produces 15 HP more power than Ford Scorpio, but torque is 10 NM less than Ford Scorpio. Thanks to more power Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 10.1 | |
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Omega consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
1070 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.79 m | 4.82 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.39 m | |
Opel Omega is smaller, but higher. Opel Omega is 3 cm shorter than the Ford Scorpio, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Omega is 7 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 1`770 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | below average | |
Ford Scorpio has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Omega, so Ford Scorpio quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |