Opel Omega 1994 vs BMW 5 series 1993

 
Opel Omega
1994 - 1997
BMW 5 series
1993 - 1995
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Diesel2.5 Diesel

Performance

Power: 130 HP115 HP
Torque: 250 NM222 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.5 seconds14 seconds
Opel Omega is more dynamic to drive.
Opel Omega engine produces 15 HP more power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 28 NM more than BMW 5 series. Thanks to more power Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.57.3
Opel Omega consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 30 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1000 km in combined cycle1090 km in combined cycle
BMW 5 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.72 m
Width: 1.79 m1.75 m
Height: 1.46 m1.41 m
Opel Omega is larger.
Opel Omega is 7 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 4 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 530 litres460 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
830 litresno data
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity.
Opel Omega has 70 litres more trunk space than the BMW 5 series.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`1702`010
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

above average
BMW 5 series has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than BMW 5 series, so BMW 5 series quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 10004400
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
BMW 5 sērija has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv