Opel Omega 1994 vs BMW 5 series 1993
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 130 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 222 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 14 seconds | |
Opel Omega is more dynamic to drive. Opel Omega engine produces 15 HP more power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 28 NM more than BMW 5 series. Thanks to more power Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.3 | |
Opel Omega consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
BMW 5 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.79 m | 4.72 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.41 m | |
Opel Omega is larger. Opel Omega is 7 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 4 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 460 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | no data | |
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity. Opel Omega has 70 litres more trunk space than the BMW 5 series. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`010 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | above average | |
BMW 5 series has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than BMW 5 series, so BMW 5 series quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 4400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |